Archive | September, 2025

Billionaire-Financed Education Propaganda

29 Sep

By Thomas Ultican 9/29/2025

September 9th, propaganda rag, ‘The 74’, published a classic example of anti-public education flummery, “COVID Worsened Long Decline in 12th-Graders’ Reading”. That long decline is a drop of nine points on a 500 point scale, but if the y-values on a line chart are manipulated it does look like a long decline. Starting with the 1994 data instead of the 1992 data that drop becomes 6 points, all of which occurred after science of reading was widely forced into classrooms starting about 2013. Whatever the cause for mildly declining reading scores, the article offers hair-on-fire analysis from pro-billionaire sources.

The 2024 math results had a 7-point decline from the highs; however 12th grade math data has only been gathered since 2005.

Professional Analysis – Really?

George Bush and Ted Kennedy gave us the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act which significantly expanded the role of the federal government in education. Its philosophy of test and punish substantially increased the pressure to score well on testing. Since the only variable that higher test scores correlate with is family wealth, the high stakes meant that several outstanding schools in poor neighborhoods were destroyed. Another pernicious outcome of NCLB was the narrowing of curriculum.

‘The 74’ turned to a person deeply associated with NCLB, former US Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, for expert comments.

Near the conclusion of the Bush administration, Michelle R. Davis shared:

“Spellings, who has been working on education issues for Bush since the 1990s and his days as a Texas governor, is the person who from the very beginning has had to make NCLB work. She was a key architect of the law, arguably Bush’s most significant domestic accomplishment and a grand experiment for Republicans, who traditionally thought education should be left to the states.”

George Bush and Margaret Spellings at her Swearing in

In reality, NCLB was a major disaster and its testing ideology still harms schools. The big fallacy at its foundation is that error and variability are so rampant in standardized testing the scores are meaningless. An Ouija board would be just as accurate.

‘The 74’ reports that Spellings believes the last several administrations have squandered the power of the federal government and weakened its ability to push improvement. They quote her saying, “When you take your foot off the gas and stop using federal leadership, federal imperative around these performance issues, it shows up.” She claims the Every Student Succeeds Act, implemented by President Obama, was “less Muscular” than NCLB and asserts, “We know how to use the federal role in smarter ways to the benefit of kids, and we stopped doing it.”

In 2010, Diane Ravitch who had supported NCLB wrote the book “The Death and Life of the Great American School System” revealing her conclusion that she had been wrong. A book review by the anti-testing organization Fair Test stated:

“The book’s central chapter on NCLB describes, with exceptional clarity, the law’s flawed assumptions and failed prescriptions. She appropriately lambastes the goal of 100% proficiency, quoting her conservative friends Chester Finn and Frederick Hess saying the goal is ‘comparable to Congress declaring that every last molecule of water or air pollution would vanish by 2014.’ The important difference, she writes, is that ‘If pollution does not utterly vanish….no public official will be punished.’ The chapter concludes, ‘Good education cannot be achieved by a strategy of testing children, shaming educators, and closing schools.”’

Another expert source quoted by ‘The 74’ is Robin Like, Director of the Center for Reinventing Public Education (CRPE). Founder Paul Hill’s acolyte, Robin Lake, says these latest results are “frustrating.” She claims, “[T]hat if we don’t change course, things will be very bad — and things are very bad.”

In 2021, for mysterious reasons, this Bill Gates financed organization left the University of Washington for new digs at Arizona State University.

The sky is falling rhetoric is common for CRPE. Founder Hill was a member of Brooking’s cadre of researchers convinced that American public education was failing. Furthermore, they shared a general agreement that market based business principles were central to fixing schools and declared teachers unions and governance by locally elected school boards must be overturned if education was to be saved.

Much of the “research” done by CRPE undermines public education and promotes its privatization.

Lake worked on “Doing School Choice Right” funded by the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Annie E. Casey Foundation, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. CPRE listed two salient goals for their study:

  • “Create models for how school districts can oversee public schools in multiple ways—including direct operation, chartering, contracting, and licensing private schools to admit voucher students. This study is conducted in partnership with the National Charter School Research Project.”
  • “Examine issues involved in moving toward pupil-based funding, particularly technical, legal, and regulatory barriers.”

These themes are central to CRPE’s education ideology.

Billionaire Who Motivated ‘The 74’s’ Article

The article ends with two disclosures. (1) “This article was published with the support of XQ Institute” and (2) “The Future of High School Network and The 74 both receive financial support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, XQ and the Walton Family Foundation.”

The Future of High School Network has one purpose and that is to end the Carnegie unit. More than receiving financial support from the Carnegie Corporation it is owned and founded by the corporation. EdTech leaders want to get rid of the Carnegie unit in order to institute their kids at screens education schemes.

The Carnegie unit is a minimum requirement creating a nationwide agreed-upon structure. It does not control pedagogy or assessments but insures a minimum amount of time on task.

Writer Derek Newton wisely pointed out in Forbes:

“Cheating … is so pervasive and so easy that it makes a complete mockery of any effort to build an entire education system around testing.”

“But because of the credit hour system, which is designed to measure classroom instruction time, it’s still relatively hard to cheat your way to a full college degree.”

Laurene Powell Jobs is famous for having been married to technology genius and Apple founder Steve Jobs. She is a billionaire and co-owns Atlantic magazine. Jobs studied economics and political science at University of Pennsylvania and received an MBA from Stanford; has no education training. In 1997, she founded the Emerson Collective which promotes impact investing and she is board chair of The XQ Institute.

Billionaire Laurene Powell Jobs is a leader in the AI-revolution in education. Her Amplify digital lessons liberally apply AI and her XQ Institute is working to integrate AI into classrooms. Edward Montalvo, XQ institute’s senior education writer has claimed:

‘“The future of AI in education is not just about adopting new technologies; it’s about reshaping our approach to teaching and learning in a way that is as dynamic and diverse as the students we serve,’ XQ Institute Senior Advisor Laurence Holt said. … Through AI, we can also transcend the limitations of the Carnegie Unit — a century-old system in which a high school diploma is based on how much time students spend in specific subject classes.

“Changing that rigid system is our mission at XQ.”

Turns out Laurene Powell Jobs is a typical arrogant billionaire who thinks because they are rich they must be brilliant. With no education background, she is angling to revolutionize public education with harmful technology. She has no clue about the damage being wreaked.

Tags: , , , , ,

Shocking GOP Effort to End Public Schooling

21 Sep

By Thomas Ultican 9/21/2025

This year, state legislators have proposed in excess of 110 laws pertaining to public education. Of those laws, 85 were centered on privatizing K-12 schools. Republican lawmakers sponsored 83 of the pro-privatization laws. Which begs the question, has the Grand Old Party become the Grifting Oligarchs Party? When did they become radicals out to upend the foundation of American greatness?

The conservative party has a long history of being anti-labor and has always been a hard sell when it came to social spending. However, they historically have supported public education and especially their local schools. It seems the conservative and careful GOP is gone and been replaced by a wild bunch. It is stupefying to see them propose radical ideas like using public money to fund education savings accounts (ESA) with little oversight. Parents are allowed to use ESA funds for private schools (including religious schools), for homeschool expenses or educational experiences like horseback riding lessons.

A review of all the 2025 state education legal proposals was used to create the following table.

In this table, ESA indicates tax credit funded voucher programs. There have been 40 bills introduced to create ESA programs plus another 20 bills designed to expand existing ESA programs. Most of 2025’s proposed laws are in progress but the governors of Texas, Tennessee, Idaho and Wyoming have signed and ratified new ESA style laws. In addition, governors in Indiana, South Carolina and New Hampshire signed laws expanding ESA vouchers in their states.

None of the 16 proposals to protect public education or 3 laws to repeal an existing ESA program were signed by a governor or passed by a legislature.

Fighting in the Courts

June 13th, the Wyoming Education Association (WEA) and nine parents filed a lawsuit challenging the Steamboat Legacy Scholarship Act, Wyoming’s new voucher program. The suit charged:

“… the program violates the Wyoming Constitution in two key ways. One for directing public dollars to private enterprises, which the lawsuit says is clearly prohibited. The second for violating the constitution’s mandate that Wyoming provide ‘a complete and uniform system of education.”’

On July 15, District Court Judge Peter Froelicher granted a preliminary injunction against the state’s universal voucher program. He wrote, “The Court finds and concludes Plaintiffs are, therefore, likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that the Act fails when strict scrutiny is applied.” The injunction will remain in effect until the “Plaintiffs’ claims have been fully litigated and decided by this Court.”

Laramie County Court House

Last year, The Utah Education Association sued the state, arguing that the Utah Fits All Scholarship Program violated the constitution. April 21st, District Court Judge Laura Scott ruled that Utah’s $100-million dollar voucher program is unconstitutional. At the end of June, the Utah Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of Scott’s ruling. However, the decision seems well founded.

The Montana Legislature, in 2023, established a statewide Education Savings Account (ESA) voucher program. It allows families of students with disabilities to use public funds deposited into personal bank accounts for private educational expenses. In April this year, Montana Quality Education Coalition and Disability Rights Montana brought suit to overturn this program. In July, the Montana Federation of Public Employees and the organization Public Funds Public Schools joined the plaintiffs in the suit. The legal action awaits its day in court.

At the end of June, the Missouri State Teachers Association sued to end the enhanced MOScholars program which began in 2021 funded by a tax credit scheme. This year in order to expand the program; the states legislature added $51-million in tax payer dollars to the scheme. The teachers’ suit claims this is unconstitutional and calls for the $51-million to be eliminated.

Milton Friedman’s EdChoice Legal Advocates joined the state in defending the MOScholars program. Their July 30th message said, “On behalf of Missouri families, EdChoice Legal Advocates filed a motion to intervene as defendants in the lawsuit brought by the Missouri National Education Association (MNEA) challenging the state’s expanded Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program, known as MOScholars.” It is unlikely EdChoice Legal Advocates are representing the wishes of most Missouri families.

In South Carolina, the state Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that its Education Trust Fund Scholarship Program was unconstitutional. The lawsuit was instituted by the state teachers union, parents and the NAACP. The program resumed this year after lawmakers revised it to funnel money from the lottery system instead of the general fund. 

The South Carolina effort has been twice ruled unconstitutional for violating prohibitions against using public funds for the direct benefit of private education. Legislators are proposing funneling the money through a fund that then goes to a trustee and then to parents, who then use it for private schools. 

 Sherry East, president of the South Carolina Education Association stated:

“We just don’t agree, and we think it’s unconstitutional.”

“We’ve already been to court twice. The Supreme Court has ruled twice that it is unconstitutional. So, we don’t understand how they’re trying to do a loophole or a workaround. You know, they’re trying to work around the Constitution, and it’s just a problem.” 

The South Carolina fight seems destined to return to the courts but they have vouchers for now.

Last year in Anchorage, Alaska, Superior Court Judge Adolf Zeman concluded that there was no workable way to construe the state statues in a way that does not violate constitutional spending rules. Therefore, the relevant laws “must be stuck down in their entirety.” This was the result of a January 23, 2023 law suit alleging that correspondence program allotments were “being used to reimburse parents for thousands of dollars in private educational institution services using public funds thereby indirectly funding private education in violation … of the Alaska Constitution.” Alaska has many homeschool students in the correspondence program.

Plaintiff’s attorney Scott Kendall believes the changes will not disrupt correspondence programs. He claims:

“What is prevented here is this purchasing from outside vendors that have essentially contorted the correspondence school program into a shadow school voucher program. So that shadow school voucher program that was in violation of the Constitution, as of today, with the stroke of a pen, is dead.”

The Big Problem

GOP legislators are facing a difficult problem with state constitutions prohibiting sending public dollars to private schools. The straight forward solution would be to ask the public to ratify a constitutional amendment. However, voucher programs have never won a popular vote so getting a constitutional change to make vouchers easier to institute is not likely.

Their solutions are Rube Goldberg type laws that create 100% tax credits for contributing to a scholarship fund. A corporation or individual can contribute to these funds and reduce their tax burden by an equal amount. Legislators must pretend that since the state never got the tax dollars it is constitutional. Lawyers who practice bending the law might agree but common sense tells us this is nonsense.

The big problem for the anti-public school Republicans is voucher schools are not popular. They have never once won a public referendum.

Tags: , , , , ,

AI is More Con than Reality

9 Sep

By Thomas Ultican 9/9/2025

The tech-industry bestowed name, “Artificial Intelligence (AI)”, is a head-fake; there is no intelligence, just algorithms. Sales are based more on fear of missing out than efficiently-usable machines. The authors of “The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want” have some tongue in cheek renaming suggestions: ‘“mathy maths’, ‘a racist pile of linear algebra’, ‘stochastic parrots (referring to large language models specifically)’ or Systematic Approaches to Learning Algorithms and Machine Inferences (aka SALAMI)”. (Page 5) These witty writers are Dr. Emily Bender, professor of linguistics at the University of Washington, and Dr. Alex Hanna, director of research at the Distributed AI Research Institute and lecturer in the school of Information at the University of California, Berkeley.

While working in Silicon Valley in the 1990s, I wrote quite a bit of code automating friction testing in hard drives. The maximum forces occurred when drives started up. About fifty test drives with sensitive gauges were used to test 50,000 or more start-stops. Once the testers were setup, it was all automated with friction data being stored in files and when the test finished, the files would automatically be uploaded to a database which would graph the data and create a report. I thought it was really cool but the only intelligence involved was mine and the creators of the database. It was a set of algorithms and nothing more; that is all these “racist piles of linear algebra” are.

Large Language Models (LLMs)

The texts produced by LLMs are plausible on almost any subject, but this is highly misleading. The models consist solely of extensive information about what sets of words are similar and what words are likely to appear in what context. The outputs look just like something a person might have written and we humans naturally interpret it by imagining the mind behind the text. Unfortunately, there is no mind and it is important for us to let go of that imaginary mind we conceive.

The authors label LLMs like ChatGPT “synthetic text extruding machines”. (Page 31) Like plastic extrusion, LLMs force language collections through complicated computer algorithms to achieve a product that looks like language. However, there is no human thinking behind it.

LLMs and their cousins, synthetic image machine, are based on massive data theft and wanton energy use. The backbones of synthetic extruding machines are data centers which consume enormous amounts of energy. It is estimated that they will consume 1,580 terawatt-hours a year by 2034. A terawatt hour is the equivalent of a billion kilowatt hours. That amount of energy is the same as the total amount of energy predicted to be consumed by the world’s most populous country, India. (Page 159)

In 2016, the largest tech companies in the world signed on to the Paris climate accords. Google said they planned to be net-zero emissions by 2030 and Microsoft announced plans to be net-negative and remove all of the carbon it had produced since its founding in 1975. Now the companies are admitting they will dramatically miss their climate pledges because of these “racist piles of linear algebra.” (Page 160)

In addition to being energy gluttons, text and image extruding machines are water hogs. For every 5 to 50 prompts ChatGPT generates, about two cups of water are consumed. The large amounts of PFAS (“forever chemicals”) used to manufacture microchips is another environmental issue. “Synthetic text extruding machines” are an environmental disaster, but for billionaires it is all about profits. (Page 157)

Bender and Hana observe, “Today’s synthetic media extruding machines are all based on data theft and labor exploitation, and enable some of the worst, most perverse incentives of each of these attendant fields.” (Page 135)

Boosters and Doomers

At the 2023 eighth Insight Forum, which was closed to reporters and the public, Senator Chuck Schumer asked the participants what was the probability of doom. It is unknown what the precise answers were but Jared Kaplan, co-founder of the AI company Anthropic, and Aleksander Madry, head of Open AI preparedness, have both spoken about “catastrophic risks” if a model grew a mind of its own. Some of the participants spoke about the myriad benefits while others seemed to harbor existential fear. Bender and Hana label these groups Boosters and Doomers. (Page 1 and Page 138)

From the authors’ perspective, Booster and Doomers are on two sides of the same coin. One sees extrusion machines as leading to a world of abundance while the other fears a dystopian hellscape. “Neither depicts the real harms of actually existing automation, at best dismissing them as less important than the imaginary existential threats.” (Page 139)

Oddly, almost all AI Doomers think AI development is a good thing. Bender and Hana suspect a few Doomers are not being honest:

“But for some of them, it’s not really about trying to save humanity, but rather a running of the con: the supposed danger of the systems is a splashy way to hype their power, with the goal of scoring big investments in their own AI ventures (like Musk and Altman) or funding for their research centers (Like Bourgon). (Page 141)

Modern Eugenics

There are claims that machines will gain an advanced level of “general intelligence”. However, there is not an accepted definition of “artificial general intelligence” (AGI). Companies like OpenAI just avoid the question. Microsoft’s “Sparks” paper contains a preliminary definition of AGI. A prior version of the paper was published in a 1994 Wall Street Journal article signed by 52-psychologists. It proffered, “The consensus group defined intelligence as a very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience.”

This was written in defense of Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s 1994 book, “The Bell Curve”, which argues that there are significant differences between the inborn intelligence of different racial groups, and that those differences are due to genetics. A bastardized use of Alfred Binet’s work on intelligence testing was employed by three eugenicists, Henry Goddard, Lewis Terman and Robert Yerkes. They created tests biased towards middle-class white Americans and that bias persist in IQ testing to this day. (Page 35)

Bender and Hana state, The paradigm of describing ‘AI’ systems as having ‘humanlike intelligence’ or achieving greater-than-human ‘superintelligence’ rests on this same conception of ‘intelligence’ as a measurable quantity by which people (and machines) can be ranked.” (Page 36)

Billionaires—among them Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen—are setting the agenda for creating AGI and financially backing a modern-day eugenics. Musk repeats common eugenicist ideals claiming that there are not enough people and that humans (particularly the right humans) need to be having children at higher rates. Marc Andreessen echoed Musk’s thoughts when suggesting that elites from developed countries should be having more children. (Page 38)

Musk and Andreessen believe we are on the cusp of AGI development or are they just selling the con? Most people working on extruding machines are aiming to make a system that achieves what looks like human intelligence “to get ahead in what is already a crowded market.” (Page 39 and 40)

Today, there is no AGI; moreover it is unlikely that machines will ever develop “intelligence”.

Some Final Observations

“The AI Con” is packed with important information that could enable people to see through this billionaire-financed scam. Read it and convince your friends and family to study it as well.

Text and image extruding machines are not worth their costs to the environment and they have many hidden inefficiencies. It is wonderful that my smart-phone can assist me with texting, but I hate the AI driven enshitification of Google’s search engine.

Extruding machines are bad for education but people are out there hyping AI’s use in classrooms. The British Government has done serious harm to their health care system by mindlessly installing AI as a point of contact.

AI is not capable of doing science. A salient feature of extruding machines is they were designed to make stuff up.

 Bender and Hana correctly note, “The AI project has always been more fantasy that reality.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Privatized Education Disaster in New Orleans

3 Sep

By Thomas Ultican 9/3/2025

August 29th was the twentieth anniversary of hurricane Katrina wiping out New Orleans. On this occasion, the billionaire-funded baloney machine is outdoing itself. Ravi Gupta wrote a post for ‘The 74’ called, “The Inconvenient Success of New Orleans Schools.” The Washington Post assigned a guy from the United Kingdom, Ian Birrell, to write, “Never seen before’: How Katrina set off an education revolution.” I gave up my subscription to the Washington Post some time ago but my friend Gary Rubinstein wrote a post about Birrell’s article. He noted, “Supposedly based on recent research, it basically trotted out all the old bogus claims that I hadn’t heard anyone claim in at least ten years.”

The truth is that the all charter school district is a giant failure that even corruption rampant New Orleans is struggling to hide.

Before Katrina, Louisiana was passing laws aimed at taking over the New Orleans public school system and there was some merit to their endeavor. Six interim superintendents appeared between 1998 and 2005. An FBI investigation led to 11 indictments in 2004 and by end of the school year in May 2005 the district was effectively bankrupt. Unfortunately, the state created the Recovery School District (RSD) and turned to privatization to solve the problem.

By the end of the 2004-2005 school year, the state had taken over five New Orleans schools. RSD turned all five into charter schools operated by four groups: University of New Orleans; Middle School Advocates, Inc.; Knowledge Is Power Program; and Institute for Academic Excellence. All set to begin in the 2005-06 school year; however Katrina made landfall soon followed by “disaster capitalists” swooping like swarming buzzards.

Before Katrina, Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB), which ran the public schools in New Orleans, operated 123 schools; in the spring following the storm, it was running just four. With OPSB out of the road and RSD in charge, “pheaulanthropists” like the Walton family, Bill Gates and Eli Broad were ready to help.

2005 Devastation by Hurricane Katrina

In 2009, Louisiana’s Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) made it more difficult for schools to remain academically acceptable, effectively ending most of the remaining public schools in New Orleans. BESE raised the minimum school performance scores for academic unacceptability to 65 for the 2010-11 school year and 75 for the 2011-12 school year. By 2018, there were no public schools left.

Evaluating the Results

In her 2018 book, After the Education Wars, Andrea Gabor wrote, “To borrow another ancient military metaphor, the New Schools Venture Fund and its New Schools for New Orleans offshoot, is the Trojan horse that funnels outside money, expertise, and influence to New Orleans.” (Page 229) The majority of the school privatizing billionaires invested by funneling funds through New Schools Venture Fund and New Schools for New Orleans (NSNO). Most of the investing was in schools adhering to the KIPP no-excuses model.

Around 2014, Neerav Kingsland was leading NSNO. He would go on to work for Reed Hastings and then become the leader of the Hastings and John Arnold created City Fund designed to promote privatization and end voter directed public schools.

In his article for ‘The 74’, Ravi Gupta claims, “There’s no one better at parsing the data than Doug Harris, who chairs Tulane’s economics department and directs the Education Research Alliance for New Orleans.” It is almost impossible to check Harris’s work because he has proprietary control of much of the education data from New Orleans. Furthermore, confidence in his work is undermined by his team sharing office space on the seventh floor of 1555 Poydras Street with NSNO.

In June, Harris released “The New Orleans Post-Katrina School Reforms: 20 Years of Lessons”. It is organized around twelve conclusions. Of course conclusion-1 claims improved student outcomes in testing scores, graduation rates and college going. (Page 8) Improved graduation rates and increased college going is a national trend for which it is hard to credit the all charter school system. The claim of improved testing results cannot be shown. Since the entire system was shut down and then reconstituted as a significantly smaller privatized organization, there is nothing to compare to that was not changed.

Gary Rubenstein explained:

“Reformers needed a new experiment where the schools would keep the same students they already had, but the staff at those schools would be replaced with nonunion charter school educators, and charter chains or start-up charter boards would run the schools. Race to the Top provided Tennessee the funding and incentive to test the reformers’ hypotheses.” (Doomed page 19)

This experiment demonstrated that it was not the public schools causing poor performance and privatizing them provided no improvement.

There are a few items in Harris’s report that do not support the privatized system. One of those is Conclusion-5: where he shares, “Transportation costs doubled, and students are traveling farther to get to school.”  (Page 20) From his map, it appears that more than 30% of the students are spending in excess of one-hour a day on busses which must be miserable and drives up costs.

In the report’s acknowledgement section, there is another reason to be skeptical of Doug Harris’s results. It says, “Second, we thank our funders, including Tulane and the Murphy Institute, but also the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Spencer Foundation, William T. Grant Foundation, and Booth Bricker Foundation.”

Like almost all large foundations the Spencer Foundation (EIN: 36-6078558) with $667,415,167 in assets makes a few troubling grants but in general is supporting research and scholarship. The same could be said for the William T. Grant Foundation (EIN: 13-1624021) with $403,141,185 in assets.

However, The Booth-Bicker Fund (EIN: 72-0818077) with assets of $68,702,721 is spending heavily to promote privatized education and almost no organization in America has spent more to privatize public education than the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (EIN: 26-3241764) with its whopping $4,309,915,225 in assets. Of course, these large amounts of money are influencing Harris and his team.

What Do the Locals Say?

In April, at the NPE conference in Columbus, Ohio, Ashana Bigard and Antonio Travis presented on the all charter school system in New Orleans.  Antonio’s description of being a student in New Orleans sounded like classic child abuse. Mrs. Bigard informed us that New Orleans schools are being sued regularly because of their practices with children. However, there is almost no reporting about the suits because the settlements always include a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). She told the story of asking a KIPP administrator how many NDA’s they had created. He said none but when she responded that she was in court just the week before and saw a KIPP NDA created, he backed off and promised to get back to her. She is not holding her breath.

Ashana Bigard is on the Right

Last year, when a charter school failed, the superintendent replaced it with the first New Orleans public school since 2017. The superintendent was fired, but that is what Mrs. Bigard said parents want. She said they desire that every time a charter school fails it is replaced by a more stable public school. Charter schools have become a revolving door with a couple schools going out of business every year.

In her 2018 book, “After the Education Wars,” Andrea Gabor reported that a third of New Orleans charter schools had been shuttered.

Senator Joseph Bouie Jr. equated the NOLA school system to the “Tuskegee syphilis experiment.” Professor Bouie, former administrator of Southern University at New Orleans, had good reason for this analogy. At Tuskegee University, black men with syphilis were given no treatment even after penicillin was shown to be effective. Dozens of men died and their wives, children and untold number of others were infected. NOLA black residents had their community schools taken away and replaced by privatized schools, often miles away. This “experiment” stole their rights and bestowed the public schools to private actors.

In 2021, Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona visited the Orleans Public School District. He heard first-hand the growing disillusionment with the all charter system. Four of the six parents told him they wanted to go back to neighborhood schools. Parents complained about Teach for America placing unqualified teachers in schools and the One App process for not offering school choice where they lived.

Raynard Sanders who has over forty years of experience in teaching, education administration and community development, said the charter experiment has “been a total disaster in every area.” He asserted NOLA had “the worst test scores since 2006, the lowest ACT scores, and the lowest NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) scores.”

In a letter to the editor, former OPSD superintendent, Barbara Ferguson, stated:

“The state took over 107 of New Orleans’ 120 public schools and turned them into charter schools. Last year, 56 of New Orleans’ 68 public schools had scores below the state average. Thus, after nearly 20 years, over 80% of New Orleans schools remain below the state average. This charter school experiment has been a failure.”

Tags: , , , , , ,