Tag Archives: Elon Musk

AI is More Con than Reality

9 Sep

By Thomas Ultican 9/9/2025

The tech-industry bestowed name, “Artificial Intelligence (AI)”, is a head-fake; there is no intelligence, just algorithms. Sales are based more on fear of missing out than efficiently-usable machines. The authors of “The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want” have some tongue in cheek renaming suggestions: ‘“mathy maths’, ‘a racist pile of linear algebra’, ‘stochastic parrots (referring to large language models specifically)’ or Systematic Approaches to Learning Algorithms and Machine Inferences (aka SALAMI)”. (Page 5) These witty writers are Dr. Emily Bender, professor of linguistics at the University of Washington, and Dr. Alex Hanna, director of research at the Distributed AI Research Institute and lecturer in the school of Information at the University of California, Berkeley.

While working in Silicon Valley in the 1990s, I wrote quite a bit of code automating friction testing in hard drives. The maximum forces occurred when drives started up. About fifty test drives with sensitive gauges were used to test 50,000 or more start-stops. Once the testers were setup, it was all automated with friction data being stored in files and when the test finished, the files would automatically be uploaded to a database which would graph the data and create a report. I thought it was really cool but the only intelligence involved was mine and the creators of the database. It was a set of algorithms and nothing more; that is all these “racist piles of linear algebra” are.

Large Language Models (LLMs)

The texts produced by LLMs are plausible on almost any subject, but this is highly misleading. The models consist solely of extensive information about what sets of words are similar and what words are likely to appear in what context. The outputs look just like something a person might have written and we humans naturally interpret it by imagining the mind behind the text. Unfortunately, there is no mind and it is important for us to let go of that imaginary mind we conceive.

The authors label LLMs like ChatGPT “synthetic text extruding machines”. (Page 31) Like plastic extrusion, LLMs force language collections through complicated computer algorithms to achieve a product that looks like language. However, there is no human thinking behind it.

LLMs and their cousins, synthetic image machine, are based on massive data theft and wanton energy use. The backbones of synthetic extruding machines are data centers which consume enormous amounts of energy. It is estimated that they will consume 1,580 terawatt-hours a year by 2034. A terawatt hour is the equivalent of a billion kilowatt hours. That amount of energy is the same as the total amount of energy predicted to be consumed by the world’s most populous country, India. (Page 159)

In 2016, the largest tech companies in the world signed on to the Paris climate accords. Google said they planned to be net-zero emissions by 2030 and Microsoft announced plans to be net-negative and remove all of the carbon it had produced since its founding in 1975. Now the companies are admitting they will dramatically miss their climate pledges because of these “racist piles of linear algebra.” (Page 160)

In addition to being energy gluttons, text and image extruding machines are water hogs. For every 5 to 50 prompts ChatGPT generates, about two cups of water are consumed. The large amounts of PFAS (“forever chemicals”) used to manufacture microchips is another environmental issue. “Synthetic text extruding machines” are an environmental disaster, but for billionaires it is all about profits. (Page 157)

Bender and Hana observe, “Today’s synthetic media extruding machines are all based on data theft and labor exploitation, and enable some of the worst, most perverse incentives of each of these attendant fields.” (Page 135)

Boosters and Doomers

At the 2023 eighth Insight Forum, which was closed to reporters and the public, Senator Chuck Schumer asked the participants what was the probability of doom. It is unknown what the precise answers were but Jared Kaplan, co-founder of the AI company Anthropic, and Aleksander Madry, head of Open AI preparedness, have both spoken about “catastrophic risks” if a model grew a mind of its own. Some of the participants spoke about the myriad benefits while others seemed to harbor existential fear. Bender and Hana label these groups Boosters and Doomers. (Page 1 and Page 138)

From the authors’ perspective, Booster and Doomers are on two sides of the same coin. One sees extrusion machines as leading to a world of abundance while the other fears a dystopian hellscape. “Neither depicts the real harms of actually existing automation, at best dismissing them as less important than the imaginary existential threats.” (Page 139)

Oddly, almost all AI Doomers think AI development is a good thing. Bender and Hana suspect a few Doomers are not being honest:

“But for some of them, it’s not really about trying to save humanity, but rather a running of the con: the supposed danger of the systems is a splashy way to hype their power, with the goal of scoring big investments in their own AI ventures (like Musk and Altman) or funding for their research centers (Like Bourgon). (Page 141)

Modern Eugenics

There are claims that machines will gain an advanced level of “general intelligence”. However, there is not an accepted definition of “artificial general intelligence” (AGI). Companies like OpenAI just avoid the question. Microsoft’s “Sparks” paper contains a preliminary definition of AGI. A prior version of the paper was published in a 1994 Wall Street Journal article signed by 52-psychologists. It proffered, “The consensus group defined intelligence as a very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience.”

This was written in defense of Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s 1994 book, “The Bell Curve”, which argues that there are significant differences between the inborn intelligence of different racial groups, and that those differences are due to genetics. A bastardized use of Alfred Binet’s work on intelligence testing was employed by three eugenicists, Henry Goddard, Lewis Terman and Robert Yerkes. They created tests biased towards middle-class white Americans and that bias persist in IQ testing to this day. (Page 35)

Bender and Hana state, The paradigm of describing ‘AI’ systems as having ‘humanlike intelligence’ or achieving greater-than-human ‘superintelligence’ rests on this same conception of ‘intelligence’ as a measurable quantity by which people (and machines) can be ranked.” (Page 36)

Billionaires—among them Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen—are setting the agenda for creating AGI and financially backing a modern-day eugenics. Musk repeats common eugenicist ideals claiming that there are not enough people and that humans (particularly the right humans) need to be having children at higher rates. Marc Andreessen echoed Musk’s thoughts when suggesting that elites from developed countries should be having more children. (Page 38)

Musk and Andreessen believe we are on the cusp of AGI development or are they just selling the con? Most people working on extruding machines are aiming to make a system that achieves what looks like human intelligence “to get ahead in what is already a crowded market.” (Page 39 and 40)

Today, there is no AGI; moreover it is unlikely that machines will ever develop “intelligence”.

Some Final Observations

“The AI Con” is packed with important information that could enable people to see through this billionaire-financed scam. Read it and convince your friends and family to study it as well.

Text and image extruding machines are not worth their costs to the environment and they have many hidden inefficiencies. It is wonderful that my smart-phone can assist me with texting, but I hate the AI driven enshitification of Google’s search engine.

Extruding machines are bad for education but people are out there hyping AI’s use in classrooms. The British Government has done serious harm to their health care system by mindlessly installing AI as a point of contact.

AI is not capable of doing science. A salient feature of extruding machines is they were designed to make stuff up.

 Bender and Hana correctly note, “The AI project has always been more fantasy that reality.”

Tags: , , , , ,

A Call for Segregation, Exclusion and Caste

8 May

By Thomas Ultican 5/8/2024

Republicans, following the lead of Manhattan Institute’s Christopher Rufo, are out to end Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs. The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, wrote on X, “DEI is just another word for racism.” Rufo’s and Musk’s central complaint is DEI unfairly harms white people. Billionaire hedge-fund manager, Bill Ackman, wrote, “DEI is racist because reverse racism is racism, even if it is against white people.”  It is easy to conclude, these men are calling for policies leading back to 1876 and segregation, exclusion and caste (SEC).

Bill Ackman is not a GOP shill. He is a neoliberal who has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Al Gore, Barack Obama and Pete Buttigieg. When Musk responded to a post on X, blaming Jews for flooding countries in the West with “hordes of minorities,” calling it “actual truth,” Ackman leaped to his defense with “Elon Musk is not an antisemite.” This is as hard to believe as Republicans are warriors against anti-Semitism. After all, the Republican Party is the main vector for the anti-Semitic “replacement theory.” A theory claiming Jews are involved in a plot to inundate the U.S. with undocumented immigrants who will “replace” the ebbing white majority and keep the GOP out of power.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal about his role in bringing down Harvard’s first ever black female President, Claudine Gay, Rufo ignored claims of plagiarism and anti-Semitism brought against her and focused on efforts ending DEI in higher education. Gay’s chief critic was Bill Ackman. In a long statement, he claimed DEI was the “root cause” of anti-Semitism at Harvard.

Ending DEI at College

Medical Schools Do Not Want Students Who Look and Think Alike

The Chronicle of Higher Education reports at least 82 bills opposing DEI in higher education have been filed in 20 states since 2023. Twelve of them became law in Idaho, Indiana, Florida, Texas and other states lead by GOP politicians. Kevin Stitt, the Governor of Oklahoma, signed an executive order in December, ending spending on DEI, claiming:

“Encouraging our workforce, economy, and education systems to flourish means shifting focus away from exclusivity and discrimination, and toward opportunity and merit. We’re taking politics out of education and focusing on preparing students for the workforce.”

The OU student newspaper reported, “Offices that are focused on African American, Hispanic, or LGBTQ+ students likely violate the Executive Order.”

Florida has a long dark history of racism, ranging from fighting in the civil war for rights to own black people to the 1923 Ocoee massacre that powerful Floridians are trying to hide. Totally in keeping with this racist past, Tallahassee Democrat reported the DeSantis administration pushed to gut diversity, equity and inclusion programs in higher education. In May 2023, the Governor signed a bill banning state public colleges and universities from spending money on DEI. He asserted:

“This bill says the whole experiment with DEI is coming to an end in the state of Florida. We are eliminating the DEI programs.”

In June 2023, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill, dismantling DEI programs in higher education. It was introduced into the state senate by State Senator Brandon Creighton. Afterwards, Creighton claimed, “With this bold, forward-thinking legislation to eliminate DEI programs, Texas is leading the nation, and ensuring our campuses return to focusing on the strength of diversity and promoting a merit-based approach where individuals are judged on their qualifications, skills, and contributions.”

Dallas Morning News reported:

“The bill was challenged by Democrats every step of the way, from the Senate higher education subcommittee to the House floor. But starting in January 2024, Texas campuses must eliminate DEI offices, mandatory DEI statements and training.”

Abbott also signed a related law, reducing tenure protection for college professors. As a result, higher education institutions in Texas are finding it more difficult to attract top professors.

Stephanie Saul of the New York Times notes that some schools are finding workarounds to mitigate damage. Whereas both University of Florida and University of Texas ended their DEI programs and terminated administrators and staff, Florida State University and University of Tennessee took steps to save employees and continue some valuable services that would otherwise be lost.

Florida State University did it mostly by changing title names and reclassifying positions of employees, already working in DEI to give them new roles; an approach that did not require laying anyone off. This left in place some of the previous DEI department’s work. The school reshuffled jobs and turned the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Office into the Office of Equal Opportunity Compliance and Engagement.

At University of Tennessee, the DEI program is now called Division of Access and Engagement. The newly named department is still working to diversify the campus and beat back injustice. Unfortunately Tennessee lawmakers have become wise to the workaround. A bill introduced in January specifically stated that no such offices should be operating “regardless of name or designation.” White GOP lawmakers are steadfastly opposed to diversity, equity and inclusion. They see it as a “WOKE” plot foisted on them by liberals.

Corporations and DEI

Corporations Value Diversity

Surprisingly America’s corporations are quite bullish on DEI. Taylor Tedford of the Washington Post shared, “In his annual letter to shareholders this year, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon emphasized that DEI ‘initiatives make us a more inclusive company and lead to more innovation, smarter decisions and better financial results for us and for the economy overall.’” Many large companies tout DEI as leading to business success. A 2023 study of 1200 firms by McKinsey & Company found organizations with the highest racial, ethnic and gender representation are 39% more likely to outperform. A Moody’s study found companies with greater diversity on their boards and in executive leadership have higher ratings.

However conservative opponents of DEI are attacking corporations in court. Last September, a federal judge in Washington State threw out the lawsuit alleging Starbucks violated its duty to shareholders by endeavoring to diversify its workforce. The suit was based on the company’s goals of hiring more people of color, attracting diverse suppliers and tying executive pay to achieving diversity goals.

Growing legal, social and political attacks cause some organizations to delete DEI from public view. They are not necessarily abandoning it but rewriting policies that once emphasized race and gender to prioritize inclusion for all.

Opinion

Manhattan Institute’s, Christopher Rufo, worked at Discovery Institute, dedicated to replacing Darwinian biology with “intelligent design”. There, he developed a talent for tapping into white insecurities with racially dishonest tropes, like abuse of critical race theory (CRT). As the CRT furor began to wane, Rufo turned to another racially-sensitive topic, reframing DEI as being against white people.

Sadly the GOP, which used to have ideals and ethics, joined this campaign. The fact is non-white males and women are not competing on a level playing field when it comes to hiring, admittance to training programs or gaining promotions. DEI programs work to rectify this. Now, Republicans are turning this on its head, claiming it is the “WOKE” agenda of liberals working against white people. This racially-tinged attack on women and minorities demonstrates how bankrupt the GOP ideology has become.

Doubtlessly there are some legitimate grievances with DEI but that does not mean it should be destroyed. Some aspects of the movement may need reformation but America needs this tool. Instead of lamenting people who are different, we need to awaken to the fact that these differences should be celebrated as the key to our greatness.

Conservative lawmakers have set themselves up by opposing diversity, fighting against equal opportunity and ignoring inclusion.

Their fight against DEI is not a good look … it appears racist, caring only about whites.

Tags: , , , , , , ,